SH2L provides the option for us to focus immediately on projects that have high upfront impact on global decarbonization as opposed to massive back ended projects that misses the point on timing. In fact, we should be more tactical in the way we sequence our climate solutions optimally. Perhaps we should consider the following possibility:
- Allocate heavy investment in Prime Site Integrated Production to bring cost of NaBH4 down substantially together with the cost of all associated renewables in exceptionally large scale.
- Solid H2 can be used to power mining industry so that the additional demand for critical minerals will not result in extreme emissions.
- Lowered price of renewable energy and H2 can increasingly be used to
produce Green Cement, Green Aluminum and Green Steel.
- Adding massive quantities of fixed infrastructures for the Net Zero Grid can be stepped up again after we have sufficient stock of Green H2, Cement, Aluminum and Steel.
Being tactically astute in sequencing out responses could make huge differences in the overall effectiveness of our climate measures and could well be the difference between a "hothouse earth" and a better tomorrow.
This is truly the "Elephant in the Room" which have been overlooked for far too long. Mankind may well fail the Climate Test due to "lack of collaboration" rather than the "lack of technology solution". The issues are difficult, complex and sensitive and there are no easy solutions in sight. Solid H2 Logistics is not a silver bullet, but it does provide and ecosystem and framework which mitigates some of the key impediments and creates conditions which support alignment of tangible economic interests with multilateral collaboration.
Inclusivity: There can be no true collaboration without inclusivity. A heavily infrastructure-intensive solution is inherently and structurally non-inclusive because they can only be deployed in corridors which can afford it and have the density to justify it. Others will be disenfranchised. Conversely, Solid H2 (once production costs are adequately addressed) can be distributed to all locations without reliance on much infrastructure. Its structurally designed to be as inclusive as it can get.
Aligning Tangible Economic Benefits with Collaboration: Perhaps we could get various nations to pool their financial resources under a multilateral collaborative framework (e.g., United Nations) to designate several giant Prime Sites for dedicated NaBh4 production. The Solid H2 produced will be allocated and shipped back to the participating countries based on their “equity share” (which can be adjusted by agreement to consider various relevant considerations). Utilizing the best locations on the planet will provide most efficient use of capex, unprecedented scale will lower production costs and the development under the aegis of a Multilateral Treaty (or UN) will lower financing costs due to lowered political risk.